Wednesday, January 23, 2008

Another Hero Has Gone Home


Dr. L. Russ Bush went home to be with Jesus on Tuesday evening, January 22, 2008. While other names get more press (for better or worse) in Baptist life, Dr. Bush was perhaps the most influential scholar among Southern Baptists in the last half-century. At one time he served as President of the Evangelical Theological Society, and served in key leadership roles at both Southwestern and Southeastern Seminaries.

The phrase, "a gentleman and a scholar" is undoubtedly overused in our day, and applied to many who do not deserve it. No one I have ever known deserves this title more than Dr. Bush. I was aware of Dr. Bush long before I began my studies at Southeastern. For many years I had been familiar with the landmark book he co-authored with Tom Nettles, entitled Baptists and the Bible. This book did much to solidify the heritage of biblical inerrancy in Southern Baptist life during the tumultuous period now referred to as "The Conservative Resurgence." While some would view those days as a political powerplay on the part of some conservatives (and for some, it certainly was), this book showed that biblical inerrancy was the hallmark of Baptist doctrine from our earliest days.

I remember having lunch with Dr. Stephen Nichols at Lancaster Bible College one afternoon, and sharing with him that I was going to attend Southeastern Seminary. He said, "Make sure you take every opportunity to study under Russ Bush." I did just that. During my first semester at Southeastern, I took Dr. Bush's Philosophy class from 6:30-9:30 pm on Thursday evenings. I would always linger after class to ask questions of Dr. Bush, and we would walk together across the dark, magnolia lined brick paths between Adams and Stealy Halls. I felt as if I were walking with Socrates during those brief moments. They are treasured memories! By concentrating in Apologetics, I was able to sit under Dr. Bush's teachings again and converse with him on occasion while a student at Southeastern. How grateful I am to God for those opportunities.

Among the students at Southeastern, Dr. Bush was held in high respect, even though many I knew did not appreciate him as a teacher. On the contrary, this is where I valued him most. Dr. Bush was a professor in the classical sense of the word. He would venture into class, usually a few minutes late, carrying an armload of books and binders, and assume his place at the podium where he would stand and lecture for three solid hours. Dr. Bush never bought into the new paradigm of teaching which views education as a collaboration of the opinions of the unlearned. He was the expert, there to impart his wisdom in a humble way to those who wanted to learn. To me, this is what seminary should be. I regret that with few exceptions, teachers of this type have left us, and we are the worse off for it.

Dr. Bush's legacy will live on through his writings. In addition to countless journal articles and book reviews (I don't know anyone (!) who read and reviewed as many books as he did), Dr. Bush has left us with several excellent books, including Baptists and the Bible, The Advancement (published while I was studying under him in Philosophy), The Handbook for Christian Philosophy, and Classical Readings in Christian Apologetics. In addition, in one of the most appropriate moves in the school's brief history, Southeastern honored Dr. Bush's legacy with the establishment of the L. Russ Bush Center for Faith and Culture. No one I know in Baptist was able to view the culture through the lens of the Christian worldview more astutely than Dr. Bush. Perhaps Billy Belk said it best in our email exchange this morning: "
Dr. Bush leaves quite a legacy at SEBTS, and I believe his presence there more than any of its presidents over the past 20 years is why SEBTS is the greatest seminary in the world."

I rejoice today that Dr. Bush's battle with brain cancer is over, and he is the victor. He is now forever with the Christ he served so faithfully in his time on this earth. But with that joy comes a sadness in recognizing that another member of a great generation of Baptists has left us. I fear that we are desperately lacking the kind of clear-thinking, biblically-faithful, voice that Russ Bush, Mark Corts, Adrian Rogers and others represented. May their tribe increase, and may we who were blessed to be shaped by these great men rise up in our own generation to be used of God in the way that they were.

Monday, January 14, 2008

Who Is Jesus? Mark 8:27-33

Mark 8:27-33
Who Is Jesus?

As we return to our study of the Gospel according to Mark today, we resume in the passage that is the climax of this book. Everything in Mark that precedes this text anticipates it. Everything that will follow subsequently flows from this text. It is the very center-point of this Gospel for good reason, because it deals with the all-important question of who Jesus is. Throughout history, the name of Jesus has been revered by many, and often for various reasons. It is an age-old discussion.

In this election year, we are bombarded with information gathered by use of opinion polls. We are constantly fed data in the news about the economy, the war, the President’s job performance, and the various candidates for public office all gleaned from polling the people to determine the prevailing public opinion. Those who are campaigning for president, for instance, shape their platform and their campaign strategy on what people are saying about them. But what would we gather if we were to poll the populus about Jesus? And in this passage, Jesus asks the disciples to interpret the diverse public opinion about who He is. But then He comes to another more important question, “Who do you say that I am?” And if each of us were to stand face to face with Jesus today, as the twelve did along the way to Caesarea Philippi, the discussion would move rapidly toward that same question for each of us as well – “Who do you say that Jesus is?” As we consider this question we will see that there are many opinions about who He is, but only one answer is correct.

I. There are many popular opinions about who Jesus is. (vv27-28)

Jesus asks the disciples in v27, “Who do people say that I am?” And we see that even during the years that He walked this earth, public opinion about Him varied. The disciples summarize a few of the prevailing views about Him. Some in that day were saying that He was John the Baptist, returned to life. You may recall from Chapter 6 that even Herod Antipas, who had put John to death, feared that he had returned to life. After all, John was the boldest prophet of God to speak in four hundred years. And after four hundred years of prophetic silence, it would be hard to imagine a new wave of spokesmen for God rising up. So similar was the message of John to the message of Jesus, some believed that Jesus had to be a reincarnated John.

Others believed Him to be Elijah. Now, Elijah was the first of the great Old Testament prophets. He lived during the 800s BC, but those familiar with the Old Testament will recall that he did not experience death. Only two people in the Bible did not see death. We read in Genesis 5 of Enoch, the seventh generation after Adam. He is characterized in Scripture as a man who walked with God. The writer of Hebrews says of Him, “By faith Enoch was taken up so that he would not see death; AND HE WAS NOT FOUND BECAUSE GOD TOOK HIM UP; for he obtained the witness that before his being taken up he was pleasing to God.” Every human being before and after Enoch was born, lived, and then died – with the exception of one. That was Elijah. After Elijah had transferred his prophetic ministry to his successor Elisha, the Bible says in 2 Kings 2 that the two of them were walking together and talking, when suddenly there appeared “a chariot of fire and horses of fire which separated the two of them. And Elijah went up by a whirlwind to heaven. … And [Elisha] saw Elijah no more.” And God had foretold through the prophet Malachi that Elijah would return before the great and terrible day of the Lord.

Elijah’s life and ministry was characterized by great displays of miraculous power. We often imagine that in Biblical times, miracles were commonplace, but that is not so. Only a handful of historic eras were characterized by frequent miracles. Apart from the miracle of creation, in the Old Testament we see miracles occurring with great frequency only during the Exodus period and during the ministries of Elijah and Elisha. Why these two periods only? Because in these times, God was validating the new revelation of His word through these miraculous displays. During the Exodus, God used miracles to validate His Law, which He gave to Israel through Moses. And during the ministries of Elijah and Elisha, God was affirming that He would use prophets like them to declare His word to His people. But for 800 years, miracles of this nature were few and far between. And then along comes Jesus. And the lame walk, and the deaf hear, and the blind see, and the mute speak, and the dead are raised, and the forces of nature are manipulated by the word of His power. And therefore, people might readily assume that this was the promised return of Elijah.

And others were less specific, saying only that Jesus was one of the prophets. His teaching bore the authority and authenticity of those who had spoken for God in bygone generations. But rather than equating Him with a specific prophet, they assumed that He had come to resume the prophetic work which had been silenced following the days of Malachi.

Over the centuries between then and now, public opinion continues to be diverse about just who this Jesus is. You would hardly find anyone who believed that He did not live, and that He did not die on a cross. There are many today who believe that Jesus was a good and honorable man who lived a life worthy of imitation. There are many who believe that Jesus was a good teacher of morality. We find those who would even go so far as to say He is a prophet. Some would call Him a martyr for a cause. Some would call Him a political or religious figurehead. And only a few would have any disparaging remark to make about Him whatsoever. And yet so many are reluctant to recognize Him for who He truly is. Most believe something true about Him, but few believe the whole truth about Him. For as diverse as public opinion about Jesus, they can’t all be right.

I recall one Saturday afternoon, when I was more patient than I am today, when two ladies came and knocked on our door. They had some magazines they wanted me to have that would teach me the truth about God and Jesus. I invited them in for some iced tea, and we sat in my living room and talked about matters of religion for an hour or so. And they proceeded to tell me that what I believed about Jesus was incorrect, and had all been invented by Constantine in 325 at the Council of Nicaea. They said that if I understood the Bible rightly, I would come to the same conclusion they had about Jesus, namely that He was not God. I opened my Bible and pointed them to John 1, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word WAS GOD … and the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us.” And I showed them Colossians 2:9, which says that in Christ the fullness of the Godhead dwells bodily. And they said my Bible was corrupted and that if I could understand the Greek language that the Bible was written in, then I would see the error of my ways. If I could see the Greek text, they said, I would know that in John 1, there was an indefinite article which indicated not that the Word was God, but that the Word was a god, (little “g”); and I would be able to see that Colossians 2:9 did not say that Jesus possessed the fullness of God, but rather that He was extremely godly. I excused myself for a moment, and went back into my study and retrieved my 26th edition of the Nestle-Aland Greek New Testament, and brought it back to them, and said, “Why don’t you show me?” And the older of the two ladies said, “I don’t know how to read Greek.” To which I said, “Well I do, and I will show you that there is no such thing as an indefinite article in Greek, and that the wording of Colossians 2:9 very specifically declares Jesus to be God incarnate. Now at this point, the older of the two women said that I was being unkind to them and that they should be leaving, and that we should agree to disagree. But before I let them go, I said, “Friend, listen to me for just a moment. I say that Jesus is God, and you say He isn’t. Now, if you are right, I am idolator; and if I am right, then you are a heretic. And one or the other of us is in danger of the fire of hell. You have asked that we agree to disagree, and I am afraid I just can’t do that, because one or the other of us is right and the other is wrong. Would you agree with me that, no matter how sincere either of us are in our opinions about Jesus, we can’t both be right?” And to that, the younger of the two said, “Sir, I just hope one of us is!”

Now I tell you that story to illustrate the very real logical impasse that we must all come to when we discuss the identity of Jesus. We can’t all be right. In fact, there can only be one right answer to the question of who Jesus is. And that is where we move now in the text.

II. There is only one right answer about who Jesus is. (v29-33)

Jesus quickly turns the discussion from public opinion to personal decision. He asks the disciples, “Who do you say that I am?” Now, bear in mind that He is not asking this question of total strangers. These are the twelve men who have been His constant companions and heard all of His public teaching, had the benefit of private instruction from Him, and have seen His miracles performed. Based on all that they have seen and heard, He asks them, “Who do you say that I am?” And the response He hears from Peter, and the discussion that follows, says much about who He is. His identity consists not only of who He is, but also what He has come to do – His title and His mission are inseparable in the purposes of God. He cannot be who He is without doing what He has come to do, and He cannot do what He has come to do unless He is who He is.

A. His Title

Accurate assessments of Jesus in this Gospel thus far have been few and sporadic, and from a surprising range of individuals. God the Father has declared in 1:11 that this is His beloved Son in whom He is well-pleased. Demons have rightly called Him “the Holy One of God,” and the Son of the Most High God.” He has been rightly identified by an unclean woman in Chapter 5, a Gentile woman and a deaf-mute Gentile in Chapter 7. Yet, the religious experts of Israel have called Him a blasphemer, a law-breaker, and even the devil himself. Even those closest to Him, the disciples, have appeared to be extremely dense at times. For instance, when He came walking to them across the water, they thought He was a ghost. They have failed to understand His parables repeatedly. They have failed to understand who He is in spite of the miracles He has performed. But now the veil has been lifted from their spiritual eyes, and Peter speaks up to confess that he finally understands who Jesus is by proclaiming …
1. His Proper Title (v29)

“You are the Christ.” For some who are new to the Christian faith, or who have not spent time in the study of the Word, “Christ” may be assumed to be the last name of Jesus, like Smith or Jones. “Christ” is His title. It is the Greek equivalent to the Hebrew term “Messiah.” In John 1:41, we see that the people of Jesus’ day understood these two titles to be equal. In their respective languages, the terms Messiah and Christ declare that He is the Anointed One of God whose coming marks the fulfillment of all the divine promises God has made, and the realization of all the hopes of those who have lived under the covenant relationship God made with Israel. Paul will say in 2 Corinthians 1:20, “For as many as are the promises of God, in Him they are yes.” And those promises pertain to salvation, so as the Christ, Jesus is the one anointed by God for the task of saving humanity. Now here is an important question – “Saved from what?”

To speak of being saved means that there is some danger or peril from which one needs to be saved. I remember as a new Christian telling people, “I got saved.” And the people would look at me funny and say, “Saved from what?” And you know, in Jesus’ day, many people were unsure of what the Messiah-Christ was coming to save them from as well. Some thought that Messiah was coming to save them from the oppression of Rome, and they thought that He was going to lead a military coup de’ etat. But this was not the mission of Jesus. He had come to save people from a greater oppression than Rome. If they were freed from Rome’s bondage, they would still be in the grips of bondage that bind every human being – the bondage of sin. From the first entrance of sin into the world at the Garden of Eden, God had promised that a redeemer would come to liberate humanity from sin’s death-grip. This is what Christ came to do. He was the Anointed One of God who had come to bring the salvation from sin that had promised and prophesied under the Old Covenant. Therefore, Peter was spot-on in his confession that Jesus was the Christ. That is His proper title.

Interestingly enough, however, Jesus did not often use this title when speaking of Himself. Most often, when Jesus refers to Himself in the Gospels, He uses a different title.

2. His Preferred Title (v31 – “Son of Man”)

In verse 31, we find the title “Son of Man.” Jesus speaks of Himself with this title some 80 times in the Gospels. In Mark, He uses the title 14 times. No one else ever refers to Him with this name. While some insist that Jesus only uses this title to emphasize His human nature, those familiar with the Old Testament’s Messianic prophecies will recall that it has a very specific meaning attached to it. In the seventh chapter of Daniel, beginning at verse 13, we read …
“I kept looking in the night visions, And behold, with the clouds of heaven One like a Son of Man was coming, And He came up to the Ancient of Days And was presented before Him. And to Him was given dominion, Glory and a kingdom, That all the peoples, nations and men of every language Might serve Him. His dominion is an everlasting dominion Which will not pass away;
And His kingdom is one Which will not be destroyed.”
When Jesus speaks of Himself as the Son of Man, this is the text that supplies understanding to the title. He is the One who has come from the Father, the Ancient of Days, with authority and dominion, and glory, to establish a Kingdom that will consist of people from every tribe and nation and tongue who serve Him. And His Kingdom will be established forever. Biblical scholar James DeYoung says that the use of this title by Jesus to refer to Himself enabled Him to speak modestly about His person and His mission while conveying the exalted truth about Himself. Unlike “Messiah,” or “Christ,” the term “Son of Man” was not laden with popular misconceptions, but rather had a clear biblical antecedent in Daniel’s prophecy that would supply meaning to those with understanding.
So, as we examine the titles used for Christ in this climactic narrative of Mark’s Gospel, we gain insight into His identity. He is the Son of Man, the Christ, the Messiah. But we cannot separate the titles used for Christ from the mission He had come to fulfill. Only when we understand them both do we come to understand the truth about who He is.
B. His Mission (v31-33)
If you were to poll the people of first century Israel and ask them what the Christ would do when He came, you would find a variety of answers. But very few indeed would have been familiar enough with the prophecies about His coming to answer correctly. Jesus had not come to kill and destroy, or to seize the powers of this world by force. Rather, He came to save mankind by sin by suffering on our behalf. Isaiah foretold this 700 years in advance with great clarity in his 53rd Chapter. If you turn there, you will see in the 3rd verse that the Messiah would be despised and forsaken of men, a man of sorrows and acquainted with our grief. Isaiah goes on to say that Messiah would bear our griefs and carry our sorrows, that He would be pierced through for our transgressions, crushed for our iniquities, chastened for our well-being, and scourged in order that we may be healed. He would be a guilt-offering for us, being crushed by the will of the Lord. It is clear from these verses that the mission of the Messiah involved suffering. Yet so many misunderstood this. Paul says in 1 Corinthians 1:23 that the notion of a crucified Christ was a stumbling block – a highly offensive thing – to the Jews, and utter foolishness to the Greeks. But Jesus explains to the disciples in very clear terms the events that are going to transpire as they journey to Jerusalem, and in so doing, He states the nature of His suffering and the necessity of His suffering for the fulfillment of His mission.
1. The Nature of His Suffering (v31).
Jesus says that the Son of Man must suffer many things. He tells them that He will be rejected by the elders, the chief priests and the scribes. Those who ought to know the most about the promises and prophecies are among those who most dangerously misunderstood the mission of the Messiah-Christ. And as a result of this rejection, He will be killed. He knew exactly the events which would come about in Jerusalem, including the manner of death that He would face. A thousand years earlier, the Holy Spirit had inspired David to pen the 22nd Psalm in which the details of crucifixion would be spelled out in great detail, even though neither David nor any of his contemporaries had never witnessed such horrid torture. David writes in that Psalm that the Suffering One would be poured out like water, and have all His bones pulled out of joint, His heart like wax melted within Him. The skin would be ripped open so that the bones were visible and the hands and feet would be pierced – pierced, Isaiah says, for our transgressions, for our sins. But David concludes the Psalm by writing that this One who will suffer so greatly will be helped by the Lord, and will return to tell of God’s name in the assembly of the brethren. And so Jesus tells the disciples that death will not be the end, but that He would rise again after three days. He knew exactly the nature of His own sufferings He would very soon endure, and He tells the disciples in advance.

Now perhaps you recall that on the night all these events began to come to pass, Jesus prayed to His Father in the Garden of Gethsemane, saying, “Father, if it possible, let this cup,” – the cup of suffering He was about to drink – “pass from Me; yet not as I will, but as You will.” And the cup did not pass. More than just the nature of His suffering, Jesus also foreknew …

2. The necessity of His suffering (v30-33)

There is a very important word in v31 that we will easily miss if we do not take in each word with careful attentiveness. It is the word “Must.” These things must take place. If they do not, then the word of God which predicted them fails. God proves Himself to be a liar and untrustworthy. And closer to home, we are without hope for salvation from our sins, and destined for eternal separation from God. If God is to be faithful, His word to be true, and we are to be saved, then Jesus must go to Calvary just as He has said.

Now, you will notice that Peter moves from a commendable position of faith to a pitiful position of unbelief very quickly. From confessing that Jesus is the Christ, Peter rapidly begins to rebuke His Lord. This is something we must not ever do. We are in no position to rebuke the Lord. But the plan of Christ’s sufferings has caused Peter to stumble in offense. He cannot fathom the notion of a crucified Christ. Admittedly the two words don’t seem to go together very well. But go together they must if there is to be redemption. And Jesus’ sharp rebuke of Peter puts him in his place – “Get behind me Satan.” Now, we might think that sounds a little harsh, but the fact is that anything or anyone that aims to divert Jesus from the God-ordained mission of going to Calvary to die for sins is a tool of Satan, even if it is one of Christ’s own disciples.

Peter’s problem, Jesus says, is that his mind is set on man’s interests not God’s. It is God’s interest to put an end to sin’s oppression of humanity. It is man’s interest to keep Jesus around for personal gain. It is precisely for this reason that Jesus has forbidden the disciples in v30 from telling anyone who He is. With all the mistaken notions of who the Messiah is to be floating around in that environment, if this word gets out, a whole nation will be pressing in on Jesus to divert Him to perform the tasks and mission they think are best, rather than God’s mission to bring about redemption from sin.

Now, if I may here, let me add a word of contemporary significance for the church. We must keep our focus on God’s agenda and His priorities. When mere human thinking diverts us from this, we have fallen under the influence of Satan that would seek to divert us from the divine mission of God. And so no matter how counter-intuitive it may seem, we must always crucify those notions that seem like the right thing to do when they counteract the revealed word of God. Churches are destroyed and the witness of Christ is tarnished in communities when churchmembers refuse to see things from God’s perspective and allow Satan to use them to derail a church from the mission of God. So each of us must be committed to prayer and the study of God’s word so that we are having our minds renewed daily by the Holy Spirit and our priorities in line with God’s. If Peter could fall prey to this subtle tactic of Satan, you and I can too if we are not on our guard.

So, who is Jesus? Well, one might say, it depends on who you ask. To some He is a teacher, a good man, a religious leader, a tragic martyr, a lunatic, or any other speculative guess. It is not uncommon to hear two people disputing with each other, with one or both of them saying, “My Jesus is like this and such,” or “My Jesus would not say or do those things.” In 1989, the rock group Depeche Mode recorded a song called, “Your Own Personal Jesus,” and many people seem to think that they can have a unique one-of-a-kind Jesus that will answer at their beck and call and be for them only what they want Him to be. And so there are many opinions as to who He is. But only one answer is correct. If we want to know who Jesus is, why would we not ask Him, and those who knew Him best? He is the Son of Man, the Messiah-Christ, who has come to suffer and die for our sins that we might be reconciled to God through Him.

It may be that today someone is here who has believed in a very different Jesus than the Christ of Scripture. Well, only one Jesus is the one who saves, and if you have not placed your faith in Him, you are without hope in your sins. But if this very day you would turn to the Christ who lived and died for you, turning from your sins and asking Him to save you and rule over your life as Lord, He will do it. Your sins will be forgiven, and the righteousness that God requires will be added to your account as a gift of His grace, secured for you by His death and resurrection, and you will have eternal life. Someone may need to make that decision today, and our prayer would be that you would do so with all urgency.

Others of you perhaps have still been trying to obey verse 30 – “Don’t tell anyone about Him,” when in fact that prohibition has been lifted long ago. Once the mission of Christ was completed in His death and resurrection, this command was changed from “Don’t tell,” to “Go tell.” Go tell your neighbor, your friend, your loved one, some stranger across the street or across the ocean. Tell it unto the nations that Jesus is the Christ who suffered and died for them, and who rose again that they might be saved.

An Update on the Lack of Updates

To all three of my faithful blog readers and podcast subscribers:

I apologize for the lack of recent updates to the blog and podcast. During the holiday season I typically do not post my sermons, primarily because of time constraints, and secondarily because I prefer to only post those messages which continue my series of expositions on Bible books. While I returned to the Mark series this past Sunday, the audio will not be available because unknowingly I handed the MP3 recorder to the sound man on Sunday with dead batteries in it. Audio will resume next week, and the Mark manuscripts will resume immediately.

Thursday, December 06, 2007

Early Christmas Cards: Isa 7:14; 9:6

Audio available here.

Here we are on the second day of December, and we have already received several Christmas cards. I think we received our first one sometime before Thanksgiving. It seems like every year they arrive earlier and earlier. But I don’t mind that. There is something strangely refreshing about reading a Christmas message in mid-November, six or seven weeks before the day arrives. Those early greetings reminds us that the time is drawing near, and helps us to begin to focus our thoughts on the significance of Christ’s coming. Just as we get these early messages of Christ’s birth weeks before Christmas, so it was that hundreds of years prior to the first advent of Christ, God was sending His own early announcements of the Savior’s birth.

Beginning in the book of Genesis, and in nearly every Old Testament book thereafter, God was disclosing to His people His redemptive plan to send forth Messiah to save them. Jesus claimed to be the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy. He said in Matthew 5:17, “Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish but to fulfill.” The greatest Old Testament lesson ever taught took place on the road to Emmaus, where we read in Luke 24:27, “Then beginning with Moses, and with all the prophets, He explained to them the things concerning Himself in all the Scriptures.” As He commissioned His disciples in Luke 24:44-45, we read, ‘“These are My words which I spoke to you while I was still with you, that all things which are written about Me in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms must be fulfilled.’ Then He opened their minds to understand the Scriptures.” And those Scriptures were the Old Testament Scriptures. In fact, the threefold description there, “The Law of Moses, and the Prophets, and the Psalms” is a very precise way of referring to the Hebrew Bible in its entirety. If you go to buy a Hebrew Old Testament today, it is called the “Tanak,” from an acrostic of the Hebrew words, Torah (meaning Law), Nebiim (meaning Prophets), and Kethubim (meaning Writings, of which the Psalms are the largest portion).

The New Testament writers understood that Christ was the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy. Paul said in Romans 1:2 that the gospel of God was promised beforehand through His prophets in the Holy Scriptures, concerning His Son.

Alfred Edersheim, in his classic work The Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah, cites 456 verses in the Old Testament which were understood by Jewish Rabbis to have Messianic implications. Edersheim had been converted to Christ from a Jewish background, raised and educated in rabbinic schools where he was carefully taught to understand the Torah and Talmud. So his insights into the Messianic prophecies should not be discounted too quickly. Four hundred and fifty six specific Old Testament prophecies that point to the Messiah, he says. Keep in mind that conservative estimates are that the last of the Old Testament writings was completed around 450 years prior to the birth of Christ. Today we are looking at two Messianic prophecies from the book of Isaiah, which was written about 700 years before Christ.

Some have said that it is merely coincidence that the wordings of these prophecies can be applied to the life of Jesus and that these passages don’t establish anything about His identity. They say that some of those prophecies are so vague that they could be applied to any great heroic figure of history. Well, Peter Stoner, in his book Science Speaks, goes to great lengths to demonstrate the unlikely probability that these prophecies are fulfilled by coincidence in Christ. Taking just eight Messianic Prophecies, Stoner concludes that the likelihood of one person fulfilling all eight prophecies to the letter would be 1 in 1017. That is 1 in 100 quadrillion. Stoner said that this likelihood is similar to the likelihood of covering the state of Texas with silver dollars two feet deep and asking a blind man to find one particular coin. Enlarging the consideration from just 8 prophecies to 48 of them, the odds increase drastically to 1 in 10157. That is 1 in 1 with 157 zeros on the end. A googol is 1 with 100 zeros on the end. So, we are talking 57 more digits than a googol. In other words, once we reach odds of this magnitude, we are talking about practical impossibilities. The odds of one person fulfilling all of these prophecies by accident are unthinkable. The fact of the matter is that these prophecies point to one unique individual, whose identity is certain and whose incarnation is celebrated this season of the year. We are speaking of the Lord Jesus Christ, God incarnate, the Son of God, and God the Son.

I am calling these two prophecies in Isaiah God’s Early Christmas Cards. As we look at them, we see a promise concerning Christ’s miraculous birth, Christ’s many names, and Christ’s magnificent kingdom. Keep in mind that we are talking about specific statements about the coming of Christ that were recorded by Isaiah the prophet 700 years before the birth of Jesus.

I. His Miraculous Birth (7:14)

We cannot just lift this singular verse from its surrounding context. The Assyrian Empire was on the rise. You recall that Israel is a divided kingdom at this point in its history, with the Northern Kingdom of ten tribes called Israel and the Southern Kingdom of two tribes called Judah. The Northern Kingdom, Israel, joined forces with Syria to stand against Assyrian invasion. Knowing that they were still going to be unable to withstand attack, they invited the Southern Kingdom, Judah, to join forces with them. Ahaz, the King of Judah, refused the invitation. This prompted Israel and Syria to conspire to overthrow Ahaz and take the throne of Judah away from the descendants of David. So this is not just a threat against Ahaz. This is a threat against the covenant God established with David to keep one of his descendants on the throne.

Now Ahaz, king of Judah, had fallen into idolatry and has good reason to fear that his kingdom’s future is uncertain. Not only might he fall to the Assyrians or to the Israel-Syria alliance, but the one true God has been known to dethrone idolatrous kings in the past. In this passage God gives a message to Ahaz through the prophet Isaiah. The message concerns the Israel-Syria plot against Ahaz and God tells him in verse 7: “It shall not stand nor shall it come to pass.” But even though their plot against him is doomed to fail, the key to Ahaz’s survival as king is found in verse 9: “If you will not believe, you surely shall not last.”

Now Ahaz had other plans. He had already written a letter and sent gifts to the Assyrian Emperor asking him for assistance against the overthrow plot. In other words, Ahaz has placed his confidence in a pagan king rather than in a sovereign God. So, again God speaks to him in verse 11, saying, “Ask a sign for yourself from the Lord your God (YHWH Eloheyka); make it deep as Sheol or high as heaven.”

Think about this for a moment. This is what every person has wished for at some point. It is a blank check from God saying, “You name it, I will do it, to prove to you that I am true and trustworthy and that I will defend your cause.” But pretending to be super-spiritual, Ahaz refuses and says, “I will not ask, nor will I test the Lord.” Ahaz knows that if God gives him a sign, he will have to abandon his alliance with Assyria, and thus he will be vulnerable to attack by Assyria or by the Israel-Syria alliance.

So, in verse 13, Isaiah turns his attention from Ahaz to the entire line of David. He says, “Listen now, O House of David!” And then in the Hebrew language he moves from using a singular word for “you” to a plural one. It is not recognized as good grammar in English, but we Southerners have maintained this distinction better than anyone with “you” and “ya’all.” The House of David is trying the patience of God, who has sworn to keep a descendant of David on the throne forever. He wants to prove His faithfulness to that promise, but they refuse to allow Him to. So finally God says through his prophet, “Therefore, the Lord Himself will give you (or ya’all) a sign.”

And this sign is significant. Literally, we might render the Hebrew, “Behold, the pregnant virgin will bear a son.” Now, that ought to immediately stand out as unusual to anyone who hears it. How can you have a pregnant virgin? Some have said, “You can’t have a pregnant virgin, so the word must not mean virgin.” They say instead that the word simply means, “young woman.” Now you are intelligent people, I think. Let me ask you, what is significant about a young woman being pregnant? Happens all the time, does it not? So how on earth could something ordinary and commonplace be understood as a divine sign to the House of David?

Now it is true that in some contexts this Hebrew word almah can simply mean a young woman of marriageable age. However, wherever this Hebrew word almah is used in the Old Testament, and context will allow us to make a determination, the word always signifies a virgin. In fact, when the Old Testament was translated in to Greek, some 200 years before Christ’s birth, the Greek word used here was parthenos, word that can only mean virgin. And that is the word the New Testament writers use as well.

So the prophecy indicates that a pregnant virgin will bear a child. Now, it is clear in the Hebrew text that a specific virgin is in mind here; there is a definite article attached here and should be properly translated the virgin. Well, I guess there haven’t been any large number of pregnant virgins running around in the history of the world, so it couldn’t point to more than one. So, just who in the world is Isaiah talking about? Who is this particular pregnant virgin?

The only thing close to a mention of such occurs way, way back in Genesis 3:15 &. Here, shortly after the fall of mankind, God promises to Adam and to Eve that redemption is coming through a Savior. This Redeemer will suffer (His heel will be bruised by Satan), but He will crush the head of Satan in the process. Now the unusual thing about this Redeemer is that He is referred to in Genesis 3:15 as the “seed of woman.” Typically a person is spoken of as being the seed of a man, and nowhere else to my knowledge do we find reference to someone being the seed of woman. Ah, but one born to a pregnant virgin would have no human father, and therefore could not be the seed of man. This pregnant virgin of whom Isaiah speaks will bring forth a son, and He is the very same Savior and Deliverer promised in Genesis 3. He is the King who will occupy the throne of David forever and ever. And she will call His name: Immanuel. Literally, “With us is God,” or “God with us.”

John, puts it this way in the prologue to his Gospel, “The Word became flesh, and dwelt among us.” Matthew says, “Now all this took place to fulfill what was spoken by the Lord through the prophet: ‘Behold the virgin shall be with child and shall bear a Son and they shall call his name Immanuel,’ which translated means, ‘God with us.’”

What a miraculous birth we celebrate at Christmastime – God has come to dwell with us, Immanuel, incarnate in the virgin born Jesus, who is the Christ, the Son of God and God the Son, the long awaited Redeemer and King of kings.

Now notice if you will …

II. His Many Names (9:6)

In our second passage of Isaiah, 9:6, we read, “A child will be born to us, a son will be given to us.” The Son of God is eternally preexistent. He did not begin to exist on the first Christmas. He was born in the flesh at that time. And it was then that He was given to us, for God so loved the world that He gave us His only begotten Son, that whosoever believes in Him would not perish but have everlasting life.” So, the child was born, but the Son was given by the Father to humanity.

This child who will be born, this Son who will be given, has many names. Among them are …

A. Wonderful Counselor

Some translations separate these two titles with a comma, but there is no such punctuation in the Hebrew text and it seems that each title is a couplet, so here it is appropriate to connect the two—Wonderful Counselor, pele yoets. In Hebrew, this word pele, which we translate as wonderful is always used of God and never of men. It can also mean marvelous, and we need to look beyond our ordinary usage of these terms to their roots which speak of the wonders and marvels, miracles, which God has wrought. It clearly indicates the supernatural. Nothing will be too difficult for the coming Messiah. His wisdom will be limitless. In Chapter 28:29, we see Isaiah speaking of the Lord of hosts, who is wonderful in counsel. The same words are there used. Isaiah 11:2 says that the Spirit of wisdom would rest on Messiah. So this name, Wonderful Counselor, speaks of the Messiah’s omnipotence – His unlimited power to work wonders, marvels, and miracles; and it speaks of His omniscience – His unlimited knowledge and wisdom, by which He informs us of His counsel.

B. Mighty God

El Gibor is the Hebrew expression. This child who is to be born is God Himself, the Mighty God. The word Gibor suggests power and might, it is used to describe a warrior. In Isaiah 10:21, this title is used to refer to God. Now, draw back the lens a little bit. Here we have a child being born, a son being given. What is one of the first questions you ask when a baby is born? “What did you name him?” And people name kids all kinds of things. They are named after family members, they are named after biblical figures, we have known several children who had the misfortune of being named after soap opera characters. What a terrible thing to hang on a child! Perhaps worse than that, last year MSNBC reported a rise among boys who were being named after their father’s favorite television network: that’s right, these babies are being named ESPN. But, in all the craze that is modern baby-naming, no one has yet had the audacity to name their child God. In fact, in the Islamic world, where 90% of males are named Muhammad, exactly 0% of them are named Allah. In the Spanish speaking countries of the world, no one thinks twice about the name Jesus, but we don’t find anyone named Dios, the word for God. Yet, here in this prophecy we are told that a child will be born and a son will be given, and his name shall be called, among other things, “Might God.” This says something of His divine nature, that He is God come to dwell among us in power.

C. The Everlasting Father

A son can be named after his father, but a son is usually not named, “Dad.” The Hebrew word Ab means Father. So Abram is Exalted Father, Abraham is Father of a Multitude. But the Messiah is Abiad, Everlasting Father. The Son who is to be born is the Father of Eternity. How can the Son also be Father? Jesus said, “I and the Father are one.” This name speaks of His eternality and preexistence. He said, “Before Abraham was, I am.” Here is one with no beginning and no end – the Alpha and the Omega, God the Father, one in the Trinity with God the Son.

D. Prince of Peace

He is the Sar-Shalom. The Hebrew word shalom is well known, meaning “peace.” But the concept of shalom means much more than peace as we think of it, simply the absence of strife or warfare. It means well-being, wholeness, or fullness. Jesus came in the fullness of deity, bringing mankind life in its fullness through peace with God which He secured for us by His own work of redemption. As the Prince, He serves the interests of His Father, and as Prince of Peace, He has come to us on His Father’s mission to reconcile us to the King.

Immanuel, Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace. The Messiah has many names. They can be summarized with just one – Jesus. He is the promised Messiah, born to the virgin, and given for the whole world to bring us into the presence of God.

Let’s look finally at …

III. His Magnificent Kingdom (9:6-7)

We read in this text that the government will rest on His shoulders. He will be a king. And verse 7 says there will be no end to the increase of His government. That is something that no mere human king can claim. His kingdom will never end. And His reign will not be one of tyranny and brutality but of peace. And there will be no end to His peace. Complete and perfect peace is something that will never be known as long as human beings occupy the thrones of the world.

He will sit on the throne of David, and will reign over David’s kingdom, to establish it, and to uphold it with justice and righteousness from then on and forevermore. How is this possible? The zeal of the Lord of hosts will accomplish this.

Seven hundred years came and went, these prophecies were read occasionally and folks wondered, “Will it ever come to pass?” But one ordinary night, as that long-ago prophesied virgin delivered a baby boy in a stable, God’s promises did come to pass. It took place in Bethlehem, just as foretold in another early Christmas card. The prophet Micah had said, "But as for you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, Too little to be among the clans of Judah, From you One will go forth for Me to be ruler in Israel. His goings forth are from long ago, From the days of eternity." (Micah 5:2).

And as this baby was born in Bethlehem, angels appeared to a group of shepherds in the field and said, “I bring you good news of great joy which will be for all the people; for today in the city of David there has been born for you a Savior who is Christ the Lord.” God’s promised Messiah, the Lord Himself, had become incarnate in the Bethlehem manger, born to the virgin.

Though we emphasize His birth at this season of the year, we cannot think of His birth without thinking of that mission for which He was born. He came to save us from the tyranny of sin which reigns in our hearts and keeps us separated from God. He lived a sinless life, and died a sacrificial death in our place to take the punishment for our sins, and He conquered death by His glorious resurrection. He did this all for you and me, that we might turn from our sins and receive God’s promise of salvation by placing our faith and trust in Christ as our Lord and Savior. God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believes in Him would not perish but have everlasting life. This was not an afterthought of the divine will, but something that God had planned to do from the beginning, and something He had been foretelling for centuries through His prophets as they delivered these early Christmas cards, promises of God concerning the nativity of His Messiah.

And so as Christmas cards find their way to your mailbox, may each one remind you of the messages God gave to His people down through the ages which foretold of the coming of the Messiah, this Jesus whose birth we celebrate. And just as each card indicates the love expressed by the sender, so each message God delivered through His prophets told them of His love for them. Love that was expressed most fully when He did more than send us a message; He came to us in the person of Christ.