Wednesday, September 08, 2010

Starting Well

Below are some thoughts I shared with the Pastoral Ministry class last night that I have gleaned through experience, education and godly counsel over 15 years of ministry about starting off well in a new place of service.

Starting Well

Every pastor is different, as is every church. There is no single “right way” to start, but there are many “wrong ways.” Following are some rules of thumb and guidelines.

“Beware the man who meets you at the train”
Mark Corts gave me this piece of advice following my ordination service. Often a person will want to become your best friend on the first day at the church. This can be a great help, but proceed with caution. The person may have ulterior motives.

“Don’t assume change is always necessary immediately”
Remember, they got along without you before you came along. You have not come to be the Savior. They aren’t perfect, and you aren’t either. Ease into things by changing as little as necessary immediately. You earn the right to make more major changes over time.

“First things first”
Determine what things need immediate attention, and leave lesser matters for later. For me, priority 1 has always been establishing a high view of Scripture through preaching, teaching, and example. Other things can and should wait.

“Don’t believe everything you hear”
People will want to tell you about themselves, other members, former pastors, etc. Be careful not to let these opinions taint you in any way. You always want to form your own opinions over time.

“Shepherd, know thy flock”
Immediately make an effort to get to know the people. It is often said that people don’t care how much you know until they know how much you care. A church cannot pay someone to love them. You need to cultivate a love for the people through personal relationships beginning immediately.

“Put your roots down”
Commit to being at the church indefinitely. Let folks know that you are not there on temporary assignment or looking for a ladder to climb. Speak “long-term” with the people, and get involved in the community as you have opportunity.

“Learn their history”
You will want to be a scholar on this church’s history. You need to learn as much as you can about past successes and failures, important people and events. You want to lead into the future from a solid understanding of the past. Talk to former pastors and long-term members. Specifically, learn about pastors, key leaders and faithful servants. Learn about high points and low points. Discover important traditions and their origins. Learn the architectural history and plans of the church (they will expect you to be an expert on the facilities, and you don’t want to disappoint them). Use what you learn as sermon illustrations, talking points, and future planning. Speak often and speak well of the church’s history.

“Trust takes time”
In many cases, you are stepping into a situation where trust has been compromised if not shattered. In the best of cases, remember you are a complete stranger, while the members have been in fellowship for many years. It will take time to earn their trust. Don’t try to force it or rush it.

“Show them yourself, warts and all”
Be transparent about your strengths and weaknesses. They will discover them for themselves; don’t let them be surprised by them.

“Plan together”
Involve others (deacons, committees, church council, staff, etc.) in formulating plans. This sets the tone for moving forward together as a team, rather than the pastor dragging the church in a direction they don’t want to go in.

“Boundaries”
You are their shepherd, not their hireling. Be firm about convictions of doctrine, schedule, and mutual expectations. Bend where you can, but identify areas where you can’t, and make them known in a loving way.

Why Seminary?

Last night in Pastoral Ministries class, I spoke about Starting Well, Staying Long, and Finishing Strong. This lecture covered a lot of ground, from the call to ministry, to preparation, ordination, dealing with committees, enduring through hardship, and, to paraphrase Kenny Rogers, "knowing when to hold 'em, when to fold 'em, when to walk away, and when to run." We spent much time discussing education, and let the record show, I am all for it.

My educational journey has been abnormal at best. I spent my Middle and High School years aiming high toward one goal -- being a pilot in the United States Air Force. The way I looked at it, the best track I could pursue to reach that goal was through the USAF Academy or through ROTC. I graduated from high school with both an appointment to the Academy and a full-ride ROTC scholarship. I chose the Academy, but no sooner than I processed in, I voluntarily processed out (my critics say I washed out, but I know the difference). It was a matter of God intervening in my life and setting my course on His direction. With no "fall-back" plan, I enrolled in UNC-Charlotte to study history and secondary education, thinking that if I could do nothing else, I could teach history. After two years, I began to sense that God was calling me into ministry so I took a year off to consider that possibility and make further plans.

I decided to enroll in Fruitland Baptist Bible Institute. Academically, it really made no sense. I was already half-way toward a Bachelors degree by this point, but I realized that I needed an intense program of practical ministry and Bible training, so Fruitland was the most appealing option, even though I would only attain an Associate's degree upon completion there. I have never regretted that move.

While pastoring my first church, I completed my Bachelor's degree and 9 hours of graduate work at Lancaster Bible College & Graduate School. At that point, I was faced with a decision to commit to the Master of Arts program at Lancaster or to move to a seminary somewhere, and I chose the latter. After considering several options for seminary and receiving input from some trusted counselors in my life, I opted for Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary. I completed my Master of Divinity there in 2005, with concentrations in Christian Apologetics and Biblical Languages.

Along the way, people have asked me why I chose to attend seminary when I already had biblical, theological and ministerial training at Fruitland and Lancaster. I had to be convinced of the need for it, because I thought between FBBI, LBC, and self-training, I had been sufficiently educated. In fact, I was merely puffed up and arrogant. Godly counsel showed me that I needed to be academically challenged in specific ways.

Seminary forced me to "systematize" my beliefs coherently rather than piece-meal. Prior to seminary, I tried to stitch together garments of doctrinal fig leaves that I accumulated from various sources, giving no thought to the coherence of these views. Writing graduate-level research papers forced me to reexamine some of my doctrinal commitments and see that they really did not fit together or do justice to Scripture. In addition, seminary also required me to think critically about how I reasoned through issues and defended my positions on them. I had to scrutinize, redevelop, and learn to articulate a distinctly biblical and Christian worldview and apply it to many areas of life and thought. Seminary also forced me to be more careful in my handling of Scripture. I was always opposed to the practice of "proof-texting," but it was not until I enrolled in seminary that I realized that I was doing the very thing I hated. Additionally, because of my apologetics concentration, I was equipped in seminary to be more confident in my evangelistic efforts and my defense of the Christian faith. But perhaps nothing has been more of an asset in ministry than the training I received at seminary in handling the biblical languages of Greek and Hebrew. I had "taught myself" just enough of these languages to be convincing in my preaching, but seminary forced me to realize that I only knew enough to be dangerous. Taking introductory and advanced exegetical courses in each language gave me a stronger skill set and more confidence in working with the ancient languages for myself. While I am not quite a capable translator, the skills I acquired in seminary enable me to "referee" the arguments set forth in critical commentaries and other academic works, and to choose between variations in translations and textual variants. My lingquistic, theological, and philosophical vocabulary was vastly expanded, such that when I encounter a difficult concept in my reading, it is not typically unfamiliar to me, and I know to which resources to turn to find more information on the concept before proceeding.

So, I conclude by saying that anyone preparing for ministry should proceed through any open door of education that God providentially opens. Go as far as you can go, get as much as you can (besides just the piece of paper at the end of the journey), and make the most use of it as possible in your ministry. For me, that involved seminary. My seminary degree is not "terminal," as daily I am reminded of how much I still do not know and have not learned. So I desire to go further as God opens the door, and I find ways to challenge myself daily by reading solid materials and studying and revisiting things I have learned along the way. My best advice to anyone, Christian and non-Christian alike, in pastoral ministry and out of it, is to never stop learning and growing.

Thursday, September 02, 2010

Engulfed by Northernness

Today, as I study in preparation for Sunday's sermon, I am listening to Wagner's Der Ring des Nibelungen, and I am reminded of C. S. Lewis's words in the fifth chapter of Surprised by Joy. I quote him at length:

"It was as if the Arctic itself, all but the deep layers of secular ice, should change not in a week nor in an hour, but instantly, into a landscape of grass and primroses and orchards in bloom, deafened with bird songs and astir with running water. I can lay my hand on the very moment; there is hardly any fact I know so well, though I cannot date it. Someone must have left in the schoolroom a literary periodical: The Bookman, perhaps, or the Times Literary Supplement. My eye fell upon a headline and a picture, carelessly, expecting nothing. A moment later, as the poet says, 'The sky had turned round.'

"What I had read was the words Siegfried and the Twilight of the Gods. What I had seen was one of Arthur Rackham's illustrations to that volume. I had never heard of Wagner, nor of Sigfried. How did I know, at once and beyond question, that this was no Celtic, or silvan, or terrestrial twilight? But so it was. Pure 'Northernness' had engulfed me: a vision of huge, clear spaces hanging above the Atlantic in the endless twilight of Northern summer, remoteness, severity ... and almost at the same moment I knew that I had met this before, long, long ago (it hardly seems longer now) in Tegner's Drapa, that Sigfried (whatever it might be) belonged to the same world as Balder and the sunward-sailing cranes. And with that plunge back into my own past there arose at once, almost like a heartbreak, the memory of Joy itself, the knowledge that I had once had what I had now lacked for years, that I was returning at last from exile and desert lands to my own country; and the distance of the Twilight of the Gods and the distance of my own past Joy, both unattainable, flowed together into a single, unendurable sense of desire and loss, which suddenly became one with the loss of the whole experience, which, as I now stared round that dusty schoolroom like a man recovering from unconsciousness, had already vanished, had eluded me at the very moment when I could first say It is. And at once I knew (with fatal knowledge) that to 'have it again' was the supreme and only important object of desire.

" ... All this time I had still not heard a note of Wagner's music, though the very shape of the printed letters of his name had become to me a magical symbol. ... But I had this in common with Wagner, that I was thinking not of concert pieces but of heroic drama. To a boy already crazed with 'the Northernness,' ... the Ride came like a thunderbolt. From that moment Wagnerian records ... became the chief drain on my pocket money.... 'Music' was one thing, 'Wagnerian music' quite another, and there was no common measure between them; it was not a new pleasure but a new kind of pleasure, if indeed 'pleasure' is the right word, rather than trouble, ecstasy, astonishment, 'a conflict of sensations without name.'"

Thursday, August 26, 2010

A Tribute to My Late Grandfather











Russell Godfrey, 1923-2010

On Tuesday, August 24, 2010, my grandfather and namesake, Russell Godfrey, died following a severe stroke a few weeks prior. On Friday, August 27, I will stand in the pulpit of Ardmore United Methodist Church in Winston-Salem with Rev. Jock Ollis to conduct his funeral. As I have been asked to deliver his eulogy, I have prepared the following remarks to pay tribute to his life and his impact on mine. I post these words here for a wider audience than will hear them on that day. For those who do hear these words on that day, perhaps they will be clearer in print than through my grief-choked voice and stammering tongue.
____________________
Somewhere among the countless pieces of art that my grandfather collected over the years is a painting of the Thames river, flowing through London at evening, with the dome of St. Paul’s Cathedral aglow in the background. The present St. Paul’s was designed by the famous architect, Sir Christopher Wren, after the original building was destroyed by the fire of London in 1666. Wren not only designed it, but he was also the first person to be interred in the crypt of St. Paul’s. There, above his tomb, inscribed in Latin is the phrase, “Reader, if you seek his monument, look around you.” Today, I cannot help thinking that if you want to see the monument of my grandfather, Russell Godfrey, look around you at the people in this room. You are here today, no doubt, because he touched your life in a special way, and left you with memories that you will carry on for the rest of your lives.

In the center of my grandfather’s back yard stood a small replica statue of Michaelangelo’s David. Shortly after I left his bedside Tuesday afternoon, I got the news that he had died, and I thought about the words that David spoke when he received news that Abner had died: “Do you not know that a prince and a great man has fallen this day in Israel? I am weak today.” Indeed, a prince and a great man has fallen, and I am one of many who are left weakened by his death. His impact on my life is inestimable.

Russell Godfrey was born in Charlotte on March 15, 1923. The first line of Shakespeare I ever learned was taught to me by him, as he would quote from Julius Caesar to me as his birthday approached each year, “Beware the ides of March.” He was proud of his family and his roots, and had a lifelong special bond with his parents and his siblings. As a child, the family moved to the Sanford area, and then here to Winston-Salem in 1934, just a stone’s throw from this church. He graduated from R. J. Reynolds High School in 1943. I think my brother and I are about the only ones in the family who did not attend Reynolds, and my grandfather often expressed how unfortunate we were for that.

He served proudly in the United States Marine Corps during World War II in the Pacific. My grandfather showed me with pride his photo album from his years of military service and all of his medals and various treasures that he brought back from the Pacific. He had a way sometimes of embellishing tales, all in good fun, of course, and when I was a child, he showed me one of his medals and told me that he had received it because he piloted the P-38 fighter that shot down Commander Yamamoto. When I was studying about World War II in school, the teacher mentioned Yamamoto, and I raised my hand and said, “My grandfather shot him down.” I remember the disappointment of discovering that he hadn’t really done that, and my grandfather just laughed because he couldn’t believe that I had gone along with it. The medal, as it turned out, was the victory medal that was given to everyone who fought in the war. It didn’t matter to me. He was still a hero in my eyes.

After the War, he enrolled in Elon College, and in 1950 he began working for Piedmont Airlines, where he retired in 1986. Between his military journeys and his work for the Airline, he traveled to amazing places and each one of those places found its way into his heart and into his home. His eclectic collections of artwork, sculptures, and momentos were all reminders to him of the places he had been and the things he had seen. I was fortunate as a child, because my mother also worked for Piedmont, that we got to travel together as a family, and Gran was always with us.

In 1958, Russell married my grandmother, Betty Francis Roberts, and became a father to her two children, my dad, John, and my aunt Julia. He loved them as much as if they were his own. And he loved my grandmother. She died in 1975, just a short time after I was born, but his love for her never died. My grandfather, as you know was a handsome man, and quite the charmer, and often women would flirt with him. Once I asked him if he ever intended to get married again, and he let me know that no one would ever be able to replace my grandmother in his life. His undying love for her is an example I cherish every day. When I married Donia, my grandfather told me that he would be honored if I would wear his wedding band, and I have seldom removed it since. But every now and then, I will pull it off and look inside at the inscription, BFR to RGG, 4-4-58, and think about his devotion to the love of his life.

There were so many interesting things about my grandfather, that just when I thought I knew everything there was to know about him, I would learn something new. I knew he loved me, I knew that he cherished our relationship, but I never really knew why. Other kids I knew didn’t have that kind of special bond with their grandparents like I did. Donia asked him one time how he and I became so close. And I learned something that I never knew. He said that he and my grandmother had once lost a child during pregnancy, and it grieved him deeply. He had reconciled himself to the fact that he would have no biological children of his own, and that God must have intended for him to be the father that my dad and my aunt needed in their lives. But he said when I came along, right around the time that my grandmother’s illness was progressing aggressively, he thought that God had sent me into his life to love and care for like he had desired to do for his own child that was lost before birth. And he did it. I have been blessed with a loving family, and many dear friends, but I dare say that my grandfather loved me, encouraged me, and was there for me more throughout my life more than any other human being. Whenever my life’s foundations were shaken, there has always been one constant – my grandfather. I never wanted to be like another person more than I have wanted to be just like him. I carry his name with pride. I was always proud to be seen with him, and we both got a chuckle out of folks who would say to us, “Oh I see so much resemblance between you two.” Biologically, there is no way; but in every way besides biology, he rubbed off on me in more ways than I can count.

As most of you know, my grandfather was somewhat of a renaissance man. He knew a little bit about seemingly everything, and a lot about a lot of things. He loved literature, theater, paintings, sculptures, just about all of the performing arts and visual arts. He was more than a spectator; he was a collector, as anyone who ever visited his home can attest. He didn’t want to look at a piece of art, he wanted to possess it and cherish it. He saw a painting once while traveling, and he told me that he couldn’t sleep that night thinking about that painting. So, the next day, he returned to the place where he saw it, and he bought it. He saw value in things that others didn’t necessarily see. He would stumble upon a simple picture in a magazine, or receive a post card in the mail, and he would cut it out, mount it to a backing, brush over it with paints and glosses, and have it matted and framed, and you would think it came from a museum somewhere.

Gran would browse through the broken items at L.A. Reynolds or Belk, and buy something that was nearly destroyed, but he would bring it home and mix up a little concrete, or get out a little clay, and a little paint, and he would put it back together piece by piece, painstakingly, lovingly, until it was ready for display. And you know, I can’t count the times that he did this very thing for me. When I was broken, when I was in a fragile state, when it appeared that I was of little value to anyone else in the world, my grandfather would pour his love out into my life. He would invest his time in me, putting me back together as it were, piece by piece, until I could stand up straight again. And as he was dying, there were so many things I wanted to tell him, but only two things would come out and I must have said them a hundred times there by his bed. “I love you so much,” and “thank you.”

Once upon a time, Julia had a science project due for school, and the night before it was due she tried her best to mold a human mouth out of clay. She gave up and went to bed, content that she would fail the assignment. But the next morning, she awoke to find her project completed on the kitchen table. My grandfather had taken that lump of clay into the bathroom, and looking into a mirror, he sculpted the lower half of his face, from the nose to the neck, mouth open, and inserted a dental mold that he had in a drawer somewhere as teeth. And I mean, Michelangelo himself couldn’t have done it better! He told me that he always wanted to take it to beach and bury it part way in the sand and just stand back and watch people react to it. Today it sits on my desk. People come in my office and see that thing today and they say, “What’s that?” And I say, “Oh that’s my grandfather’s head.” And they just kind of look around nervously and say, “Uh, OK. Where’s the rest of him?” And that may be a question some would ask today. His body is here before us, but where is the rest of him? The Bible tells us that, for the follower of Jesus Christ, to be absent from the body is to be present with the Lord.

My grandfather was very private about his spiritual life, private almost to a fault. As I told Rev. Ollis yesterday, I know he was a member of this church, but if you asked him, he would tell you he was a Presbyterian. And Jock said, “I know, he told me that.” His Scotch-Presbyterian Calvinism would come out in conversation, and he would say, “If I am predestined, I will go to heaven, and if I am not, there is nothing we can do about it.” And while I think the Bible affirms much of what he said, I also know that the Bible says that we can be certain that we are among the elect of God by responding in faith to the Gospel of Jesus Christ when we hear it. As I told my grandfather on several occasions, “Even Scotch-Presbyterian Calvinists believe that.” And today I have hope based on his own words to me from time to time, and conversations that he had with others over the years, that there had come a point in his life wherein he had placed his faith in Jesus Christ as his Savior and Lord. He was a good man, better than most in my opinion, but I know I am biased. But heaven is not a place for good men; it is a place for redeemed sinners. All of us, no matter how good we are in one another’s eyes, fall short of God’s standard of holiness. We have all sinned, and none of us have any hope of heaven on our own merits. But thanks be to God, through Jesus Christ, our sins can be forgiven, we can receive the righteousness that God requires as a gift by faith, and have the assurance of eternal life. John Newton, who wrote that hymn we know and love, Amazing Grace, said near the end of his life, “My memory is almost gone, but I remember two things: I am a great sinner and Christ is a great Savior.” All of our hope for life’s hard moments like these is anchored firmly in these two truths. Where those two truths are known and cherished in a person’s heart, we can say with a sure and certain hope that death is not the end. Jesus is the resurrection and the life, and those who believe in Him will live even if they die. It is my very great hope and trust that this is so for my grandfather, and for each of you as well.

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

The Husband of One Wife?

In discussing the biblical qualifications of pastors, we deal in our Pastoral Ministry course with the phrase "Husband of one wife." Here, I articulate my argument that the phrase speaks to marital fidelity (a "one woman man") rather than a variety of alternative interpretations.

- The husband of one wife – literally “one-woman-man”

--- Various interpretations

----- Catholic: Married to the church; used to defend celibacy

----- Exclusion of Polygamists: Although polygamy was practiced in the ancient world, it was illegal in the Roman Empire, and certainly unacceptable in the church. Though grammatically possible, it seems historically unlikely.

-----Exclusion of Unmarried Men: Not popular; not likely. Paul could have simply said “married” if this is what he intended. Elsewhere (1 Cor 7), he extols the virtues of singleness for the purpose of serving the Lord. Paul himself was unmarried when he wrote this, yet considered himself an elder (cf. 2 Tim 1:6; 1 Tim 4:14). Also, if this means the pastor must be married, then the passage about keeping his children under control must mean that he must have children. This is hardly tenable.

----- Exclusion of Remarried Widowers: Nowhere else in Scripture is this frowned upon (1 Tim 5:14; Rom 7:1-6; 1 Cor 7:39). In response, it may be argued that all these passages address widowed women, while Scripture is silent concerning widowed men. That silence may well be instructive in excluding this interpretation.

----- Exclusion of Divorced Men: One of the most popular views. It is argued that a previous divorce may affect a man’s reputation (3:7). It is also consistent with other passages throughout the NT on divorce (Matt 19:9; Mk 10:11-12; Lk 6:18; 1 Cor 7:10-11; Rom 7:23). Some state that divorce would disqualify a man on other counts as well, such as not ruling his household well (1 Tim 3:4). This may be true, and therefore I would affirm this view with some reservations, but on the basis of 3:4, not 3:2 exclusively. I remain convinced that there are clearer ways in Greek to state “never divorced” than “husband of one wife”/“one woman man”. Also, notice that the emphasis in all these qualifications is the man’s present standing, not his past sins. If all his past sins were in view, then (for instance) we would have to interpret the next criteria as meaning that he must have never been intemperate; but we understand that it means that he may have been intemperate in the past, but not now. Note, one variation of this view holds that a pastor may have been divorced, but must have never remarried, unless it was to the original spouse. In general, I think this is sound biblical wisdom for all Christians, but I come short of disqualifying a man for ministry on this basis alone.

----- Marital Fidelity: This is the view I hold. I believe that “one-woman-man” most plainly means that the man, if married, must be completely and unquestionably devoted to his wife. After all, there are plenty of men who are not polygamists, not remarried widowers, and not divorced and/or remarried, but who are not “one-woman-men.” Also, even an unmarried man can be a “one-woman-man” in the sense that he is not a flirtatious womanizer; he is sexually pure as a single man. MacArthur, though he affirms the ideal of an undivorced pastor, also affirms this sense of the expression, saying, “The pastor must have a reputation of being sexually pure. If he is married, he is devoted to his one wife, not scandalized by past mistresses, illegitimate children, or present adulteries. He loves and desires only one woman and has been faithful to her.